Cases 1 - 10 of 734
Gregory Crowell v. CIR
as 24-1330
Petitioner:
GREGORY K. CROWELL, Bankruptcy Estate 17-13624
Respondent:
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
Mawule Tepe v. IRS, et al
as 24-5261
Plaintiff:
MAWULE TEPE
Defendant:
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Biggs v. Internal Revenue Service et al
as 2:2024cv00019
Plaintiff:
Deborah R. Biggs
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Service and Joseph Marc Ross
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 - Notice of Removal-Taxes
Naysha Oquendo v. CIR
as 24-1205
Petitioner:
NAYSHA Y. OQUENDO
Respondent:
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
IRS, et alIn re: IRS, et al
as 24-301
Petitioner:
In re: INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, DANNY WERFEL, in his official capacity as Commissioner of Internal Revenue, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY and others
Respondent:
BUCKEYE INSTITUTE
Vaughn #162245 v. Internal Revenue Service et al
as 2:2024cv00029
Plaintiff:
Derrick T. Vaughn #162245
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Service and Unknown Party
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Poole v. United States of America
as 3:2024cv00091
Plaintiff:
Claire A Poole
Defendant:
United States of America, Department of Treasury, Internal Revenue Service and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7422 IRS: Refund Taxes
Clemmons v. United States of America (JRG1)
as 1:2024cv00046
Plaintiff:
Gerald Lee Clemmons
Defendant:
United States of America, Department of Treasury, Internal Revenue Service and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 6532 IRS: Refund of Tax Penalty
Hall v. Internal Revenue Service et al
as 2:2024cv10270
Plaintiff:
Vivian Leigh Hall
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Service and IRS Commissioner
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00052
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
