Other Statutes Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 256
American Train Dispatchers As, et al v. National Railway Labor Confer, et al
as 21-7029
Plaintiff / Appellant: Transportation Communications Union - IAM, Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes Division/IBT, Transport Workers Union and others
Defendant / Appellee: Norfolk Southern Railway Company, BNSF Railway Company, Kansas City Southern Railway Company and others
TIAA, et al v. Valeant Pharmaceuticals, et al
as 21-1390
Defendant / Appellee: ROBERT INGRAM, COLLEEN GOGGINS, DR. ARI S. KELLEN and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: CATHY LOCHRIDGE
Plaintiff / Appellee: CITY OF TUCSON, together with and on behalf of the Tucson Supplemental Retirement System, TEACHERS INSURANCE & ANNUNITY ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA, TIMBER HILL LLC and others
TIAA, et al v. Valeant Pharmaceuticals, et al
as 21-1324
Defendant / Appellee: ROBERT INGRAM, COLLEEN GOGGINS, DR. ARI S. KELLEN and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: LAURA POTTER, CITY OF TUCSON, together with and on behalf of the Tucson Supplemental Retirement System, TEACHERS INSURANCE & ANNUNITY ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: TIMBER HILL LLC
LOCAL UNION NO. 456, INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS EMPLOYEE BENEFIT FUNDS AND THE TRUSTEES THEREOF v. DELANEY TELECOM
as 3:2021cv02657
Respondent: DELANEY TELECOM dba BLACK BOX NETWORKS, INC. and DELANEY TELECOM doing business as BLACK BOX NETWORKS, INC.
Petitioner: LOCAL UNION NO. 456, INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS EMPLOYEE BENEFIT FUNDS AND THE TRUSTEES THEREOF
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 9
LOCAL UNION NO. 456, INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS v. OLIVER COMMUNICATIONS GROUP, INC.
as 3:2021cv02644
Petitioner: LOCAL UNION NO. 456, INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS, AFL-CIO
Respondent: OLIVER COMMUNICATIONS GROUP, INC.
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 9
LOCAL UNION NO. 456, INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS, AFL-CIO et al v. DELANEY TELECOM
as 3:2021cv02654
Respondent: DELANEY TELECOM dba BLACK BOX NETWORKS, INC. and DELANEY TELECOM doing business as BLACK BOX NETWORKS, INC.
Petitioner: LOCAL UNION NO. 456, INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS EMPLOYEE BENEFIT FUNDS AND THE TRUSTEES THEREOF, LOCAL UNION NO. 456, INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS, AFL-CIO and LOCAL 456 IBEW EMPLOYEE BENEFIT FUNDS
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 9
LOCAL UNION NO. 456, INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS EMPLOYEE BENEFIT FUNDS AND THE TRUSTEES THEREOF v. SOLAR-MITE ELECTRICAL CONTRACTORS, INC.
as 2:2021cv02641
Respondent: SOLAR-MITE ELECTRICAL CONTRACTORS, INC.
Petitioner: LOCAL UNION NO. 456, INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS EMPLOYEE BENEFIT FUNDS AND THE TRUSTEES THEREOF
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 9
TIAA, et al v. Valeant Pharmaceuticals, et al
as 21-1218
Defendant / Appellee: ROBERT INGRAM, COLLEEN GOGGINS, DR. ARI S. KELLEN and others
Defendant: VALUEACT HOLDINGS LP, VALUEACT COINVEST MASTER FUND LP, VALUEACT CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LP and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: TIMBER HILL LLC
Plaintiff / Appellee: CITY OF TUCSON, together with and on behalf of the Tucson Supplemental Retirement System, TEACHERS INSURANCE & ANNUNITY ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA, INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS LOCAL UNION 481 DEFINED CONTRIBUTION PLAN AND TRUST and others
The Okonite Company, Inc. v. INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS, LOCAL 1196 We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv00044
Defendant: INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS, LOCAL 1196
Plaintiff: The Okonite Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
National Labor Relations Board v. Sebsen Electrical Contractors, et al
as 20-14532
Not Classified By Court: INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS, LOCAL 915, AFL-CIO
Petitioner: NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
Respondent: SEBSEN ELECTRICAL CONTRACTORS LLC and SEBSEN ELECTRIC LLC, a single employer

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?