Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Gilman v. Rodriguez Martinez
as 1:2022cv00025
Plaintiff:
LONGA GILMAN
Defendant:
ISIDORO RODRIGUEZ MARTINEZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Rodriguez-Preciado v. USA
as 4:2016cv00668
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Carlos Isidoro Rodriguez-Preciado
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Isidoro Rodriguez v. Commissioner, IRS
as 13-1966
Petitioner - Appellant:
ISIDORO RODRIGUEZ and IRENE RODRIGUEZ
Respondent - Appellee:
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
Isidoro Rodriguez v. Jane Doe
as 13-1638
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ISIDORO RODRIGUEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
JANE DOE, Member of the Virginia State Bar Disciplinary Board ("Board"), sued as individual of an unauthorized entity, JOHN DOE, Member of the Virginia State Bar Disciplinary Board ("Board"), sued as individual of an unauthorized entity, CYNTHIA D. KINSER, sued as individual and others
Isidoro Rodriguez, et al v. Commissioner, IRS
as 13-1038
Appellant - Appellant:
Isidoro Rodriguez and Irene Rodriguez
Appellee - Appellee:
United States Tax Court
Rodriguez v. Doe et al
as 3:2012cv00663
Plaintiff:
Isidoro Rodriguez
Defendant:
Jane Doe , John Doe , Cynthia D. Kinser and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Feliciano et al v. Bangkok Grand Palace, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv05720
Plaintiff:
Javier Feliciano and Isidoro Rodriguez Alejo
Defendant:
Bangkok Grand Palace, Inc. and Thavatchai Amonkosolpan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Rodriguez v. Harbetson et al
as 2:2011cv01601
Defendant:
Jack Harbetson, Sea-Search Armanda LP, Armada Company and others
Plaintiff:
Isidoro Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
RODRIGUEZ et al v. SHULMAN et al
as 1:2011cv01183
Plaintiff:
IRENE D. RODRIGUEZ and ISIDORO RODRIGUEZ
Defendant:
DOUGLAS SHULMAN, WILLIAM J. WILKINS, DEBORAH A. BUTLER and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Isidoro Rodriguez v. United States Tax Court
as 10-1016
Appellant - Appellant:
Isidoro Rodriguez
Appellee - Appellee:
United States Tax Court
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
