Cases 1 - 10 of 31
WASHINGTON v. IRWIN et al
as 1:2023cv00291
Plaintiff:
JEROME JUNIOR WASHINGTON
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT RANDY IRWIN and MAJOR J. ALEXANDER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Rochester et al v. Irwin et al
as 1:2022cv02001
Plaintiff:
Faheem Rochester and Carlos Serbia
Defendant:
Randy Irwin, E. Mongelluzzo, J. Alexander and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dominic Alexander v. Russell Washburn
as 21-2457
Petitioner:
DOMINIC J. ALEXANDER
Respondent:
RUSSELL WASHBURN, Warden
WHITFIELD v. WEINGARTEN REALTY INVESTORS et al
as 2:2021cv03206
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW WHITFIELD
Defendant:
WEINGARTEN REALTY INVESTORS, ANDREW M ALEXANDER, STANFORD J ALEXANDER and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
ALEXANDER et al v. ASTRAZENECA LP et al
as 2:2019cv09766
Defendant:
TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC., NOVARTIS PHARMACEUTICAL CORPORATION, GLAXOSMITHKLINE CONSUMER HEALTHCARE HOLDINGS (US) LLC and others
Plaintiff:
VALARIE BRAXTON and WILLIE J. ALEXANDER, SR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Scott v. Alexander
as 3:2016cv00335
Plaintiff:
Tonia Scott
Defendant:
Anthony J. Alexander
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Yun v. Lowe et al
as 3:2015cv01640
Plaintiff:
Gloria Sun Jung Yun
Defendant:
Brien Lowe, Anthony J. Alexander and Charles E. Jones, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CATALANO et al v. TOWNSHIP OF UPPER FREEHOLD et al
as 3:2012cv06393
Plaintiff:
STEVEN D. CATALANO, S. D. WALKER, INC. and S. D. CATALANO, INC.
Defendant:
TOWNSHIP OF UPPER FREEHOLD, RONALD A. GAFGEN, J. STEPHEN WALTERS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
ALEXANDER, JR. v. MARINE NAVIGATION COMPANY
as 2:2011cv57830
Plaintiff:
PETER J ALEXANDER, JR.
Defendant:
MARINE NAVIGATION COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
ALEXANDER, JR. v. ACANDS, INC.
as 2:2011cv57829
Plaintiff:
PETER J ALEXANDER, JR.
Defendant:
ACANDS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
