Cases 1 - 10 of 100
STANTS v. WALSH et al
as 2:2026cv01572
Plaintiff:
SHAUN DALE STANTS
Defendant:
JASON WALSH and JACOB MARTIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Stone v. Bergman, et al
as 26-1290
Petitioner:
DALE S. STONE
Respondent:
WARDEN BERGMAN and EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF CDOC
DALE et al v. MCNALLY
as 2:2026mc00063
Respondent:
EDWARD E MCNALLY
Petitioner:
ANTHONY DALE, JOHNNA FOX, BENJAMIN BORROWMAN and others
Cause Of Action: Motion to Compel
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv01274
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Henry et al v. Brooks et al
as 3:2026cv00038
Plaintiff:
Sean Dale Henry, Gun Owners Of America, Inc. and Gun Owners Foundation
Defendant:
Mario Brooks and Government Of The Virgin Islands
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv00647
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
REINHARDT v. BEVERLY HILLS CONSULTING et al
as 4:2026cv00338
Plaintiff:
PAUL JOHN REINHARDT and BEVERLY HILLS CONSULTING
Defendant:
RONALD DION DESANTIS, RALPH MASSULLO, JR, KENNETH LEE PRENDERGAST, JR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv01249
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1105 (a) Aliens: Habeas Corpus to Release INS Det
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv03988
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Dickinson v. Amazon.com, Inc., et al.
as 26-4521
Plaintiff:
ALAN DALE DICKINSON
Defendant:
AMAZON.COM, INC., UNKNOWN PARTY, Amazon Family of Companies, DOES 1-50 and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
