Cases 11 - 20 of 233
In re Bystolic Antitrust Litigation
as 23-418
Debtor:
In re: Watson Laboratories, Inc.
Plaintiff:
J M Smith Corporation, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated, DBA Smith Drug Company, KPH Healthcare Services, Inc., individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated also known as Kinney Drugs, Inc, UFCW local 1500 Welfare Fund and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Albertsons Companies, Inc., H-E-B L.P., The Kroger Co. and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Forest Laboratories Inc., Forest Laboratories Ireland, LTD, Forest Laboratories Holdings Ltd. and others
In re Bystolic Antitrust Litigation
as 23-410
Debtor:
In re: Watson Laboratories, Inc.
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CVS Pharmacy, Inc., Rite Aid Corporation, Rite Aid Hdqtrs. Corp. and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Forest Laboratories Inc., Forest Laboratories Ireland, LTD, Forest Laboratories Holdings Ltd. and others
In re Bystolic Antitrust Litigation
as 23-420
Debtor:
In re: Watson Laboratories, Inc.
Plaintiff:
J M Smith Corporation, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated, DBA Smith Drug Company, KPH Healthcare Services, Inc., individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated also known as Kinney Drugs, Inc, Albertsons Companies, Inc. and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
UFCW local 1500 Welfare Fund, Teamsters Western Region & Local 177 Health Care Plan, Fraternal Order Of Police Miami Lodge 20, Insurance Trust Fund and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Forest Laboratories Inc., Forest Laboratories Ireland, LTD, Forest Laboratories Holdings Ltd. and others
In re: In re Bystolic Antitrust Litigation
as 23-423
Debtor:
In re: Watson Laboratories, Inc.
Plaintiff:
UFCW local 1500 Welfare Fund, Teamsters Western Region & Local 177 Health Care Plan, Fraternal Order Of Police Miami Lodge 20, Insurance Trust Fund and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
J M Smith Corporation, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated, DBA Smith Drug Company and KPH Healthcare Services, Inc., individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated also known as Kinney Drugs, Inc
Defendant / Appellee:
Forest Laboratories Inc., Forest Laboratories Ireland, LTD, Forest Laboratories Holdings Ltd. and others
MLI RX LLC et al v. GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC et al
as 2:2023cv00429
Defendant:
GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC formerly known as SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION doing business as GLAXOSMITHKLINE, SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION, TEVA PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES LTD. and others
Plaintiff:
MLI RX LLC, AMERISOURCEBERGEN CORP., AMERISOURCEBERGEN DRUG CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Marquez v. Garland
as 22-1936
Petitioner:
MARIA MARQUEZ, J. M. G.-M. and N. B. G.-M.
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Burlington Drug Company, Inc. et al v. Merck & Company, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv00269
Plaintiff:
Burlington Drug Company, Inc., Dakota Drug, Inc., J M Smith Corporation doing business as Smith Drug Company and others
Defendant:
Merck & Company, Inc., Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation, Schering-Plough Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
In re: Metcalf
as 22-1506
Petitioner / Appellant:
RON DAVID METCALF, Parent/advocate, legal guardian as lawful guardian ad litem of Minor Child D. J. M. and CLAUDIA METCALF, Parent/advocate, legal guardian as lawful guardian ad litem of Minor Child D. J. M
Not Yet Classified:
D.J.M.
J M K 5 Texas City L L C et al v. AmRisc L P et al
as 5:2022cv01041
Plaintiff:
JMK5 Texas City LLC, JMK5 Shreveport LLC, J M K 5 Texas City L L C and others
Defendant:
AmRisc L L C, Certain Underwriters at Lloyds London, HDI Global Specialty SE and others
Counter Claimant:
General Security Indemnity Co of Arizona, H D I Global Specialty S E and Gneral Security Indemnity Co of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1 U.S. Arbitration Act
Wenning v. Renewable Energy Group, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00442
Plaintiff:
Eric Wenning
Defendant:
Renewable Energy Group, Inc., Jeffrey Stroburg, Randolph L. Howard and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
