Cases 1 - 10 of 144
Dionte Davis v. Tiffani Knox, et al
as 24-10473
Plaintiff:
DIONTE JERMAINE DAVIS
Defendant:
TIFFANI S. KNOX, C. RUSSELL, TYLER WATSON and others
Dionte Davis v. Tiffani Knox, et al
as 24-10203
Plaintiff:
DIONTE JERMAINE DAVIS
Defendant:
TIFFANI S. KNOX, C. RUSSELL, TYLER WATSON and others
Terry Lee v. Kevin Patterson, et al
as 23-3752
Plaintiff:
Terry Antonio Lee
Defendant:
Kevin Patterson, Lt., Tucker Max, Mariquse McCan, Sgt., Tucker Max, Cierra Washington, Sgt. and others
Terry Lee v. Kevin Patterson, et al
as 23-3420
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Terry Antonio Lee
Defendant / Appellee:
Kevin Patterson, Lt., Tucker Max, Mariquse McCan, Sgt., Tucker Max, Cierra Washington, Sgt. and others
Murzike v. Knox et al
as 3:2023cv01125
Plaintiff:
James T. Murzike
Defendant:
Tifani S. Knox, Richard J. Andrews, R.D. Mason and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lee v. Patterson et al
as 4:2023cv00808
Plaintiff:
Terry Lee
Defendant:
Kevin Patterson, Mariquse McCan, Cieria Wasghington and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Knox et al
as 3:2023cv00298
Plaintiff:
Dionte Jermaine Davis
Defendant:
Tiffani S. Knox, C. Russell, Tyler Watson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Solomon J. Andrews v. Chad Bianco et al
as 5:2022cv02006
Plaintiff:
Solomon J. Andrews
Defendant:
Chad Bianco, Robert Presley Detention Center and Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Marie Assa'ad-Faltas v. Sarah Weiss
as 22-1917
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARIE THERESE ASSA'AD-FALTAS
Defendant / Appellee:
SARA HEATHER SAVITZ WEISS, JOHN MEADORS, BARNEY GIESE, all three individually for damages arising from malicious prosecution and for qui tam recovery and others
Kenneth York v. J. Andrews
as 22-6844
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KENNETH LEWIS YORK
Defendant / Appellee:
J. ANDREWS, Warden
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
