Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Lynn Padgett v. James Petti, et al
as 24-1332
Plaintiff:
LYNN A. PADGETT
Defendant:
JAMES PETTI, Commander Bradford County Pennsylvania State Police Barracks, ROBERT B. MCGUINESS, Former Bradford County District Attorney & Prothonotary/Clerk of Courts, DANIEL J. BARRETT, Bradford County District Attorney & Prothonotary/Clerk of Courts and others
Padgett v. Petti et al
as 4:2023cv01764
Plaintiff:
Lynn A. Padgett
Defendant:
James Petti, Robert B. McGuiness, Daniel J. Barrett and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv01985
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv05265
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv11316
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Robinson v. Barrett et al
as 2:2019cv00213
Plaintiff:
Nina Semone Robinson
Defendant:
City of Arlington, Arlington Police Department, Peter J Barrett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thornton v. Barrett et al
as 2:2018cv00182
Plaintiff:
John F Thornton
Defendant:
Deanna L Barrett, Kenneth J Barrett, Lukins & Annis, P.S. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Markle v. Adams
as 4:2018cv00157
Plaintiff:
Joseph Robert Markle
Defendant:
Michael R. Adams, Heather Shaffer-Rockwell, Richard Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00015
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Thornton v. Pandrea et al
as 2:2017cv00367
Counter_defendant:
John F Thornton
Counter_claimant:
Kenneth J Barrett and Deanna L Barrett
Plaintiff:
John F Thornton
Defendant:
Mary E Pandrea, Kenneth J Barrett and Deanna L Barrett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
