Cases 11 - 20 of 47
BOONE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv59327
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA J BOONE
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BOONE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv26095
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
KENNY J BOONE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Franklin et al v. SNYDER et al
as 2:2018cv11967
Plaintiff:
Shyron Franklin , Helene White , P. T.1 and others
Defendant:
RICHARD D. SNYDER , Flint, City of, Receivership Transition Advisory Board and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Edwin Miller v. Harold Clarke
as 16-7587
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDWIN MILLER
Defendant - Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director Virginia D.O.C., KEITH W. DAVIS, Warden Sussex I State Prison, J. BOONE, Assistant Warden and others
First United Corporation et al v. FTN Financial Securities Corp. et al
as 1:2015cv03363
Plaintiff:
First United Corporation and First United Bank & Trust
Defendant:
FTN Financial Securities Corp., Hugh J Boone and Franklin Benjamin Kennedy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Parker v. Davis et al
as 1:2015cv01192
Plaintiff:
Samson Parker
Defendant:
Keith Davis, J. Boone, D. B. Everett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United States v. Colin Boone
as 15-2409
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant - Appellant:
Colin J. Boone
Douglas v. Davis et al
as 3:2015cv00034
Plaintiff:
Lamont O. Douglas
Defendant:
Keith Davis, J. Boone and T. Brickhead
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miller v. Clarke et al
as 1:2014cv00978
Plaintiff:
Edwin Miller
Defendant:
Harold W. Clarke, Keith W. Davis, J. Boone and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kershner v. Davis et al
as 2:2014cv00378
Plaintiff:
Toby Kershner
Defendant:
Keith Davis, Mr. Parker, J. Boone and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
