Cases 11 - 18 of 18
Cavo Broadband Communications LLC v. Qualified Cable Contractor LLC et al
as 6:2015cv02924
Plaintiff:
Cavo Broadband Communications LLC
Defendant:
Qualified Cable Contractor LLC and D&J Cable Contractors Inc
Counter_claimant:
Qualified Cable Contractor LLC
Counter_defendant:
Cavo Broadband Communications LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Essex Insurance Company v. J&J Cable Construction, LLC et al
as 3:2015cv00506
Plaintiff:
Essex Insurance Company
Defendant:
J&J Cable Construction, LLC, Dixie Electric Cooperative , Marrell A. Crittenden, Jr. and others
Counter_claimant:
Dixie Electric Cooperative , Marrell A. Crittenden, Jr. and Courtney Bynum Crittenden
Counter_defendant:
Essex Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Oliver v. Ybarra et al
as 1:2015cv00723
Plaintiff:
Anthony Wayne Oliver
Defendant:
G. Ybarra , C. Wallace , R. Cano and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Oliver v. Ybarra et al
as 1:2015at00391
Plaintiff:
Anthony Wayne Oliver
Defendant:
G. Ybarra , C. Wallace , R. Cano and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bivins v. Hill et al
as 2:2015cv00748
Plaintiff:
Joseph Bivins
Defendant:
R. Hill, S. Cox, N. Hayward and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ivan Lee Matthews v. Liles et al
as 1:2014cv00083
Plaintiff:
Ivan Lee Matthews
Defendant:
R. Liles, J. Sherrett and J. Cable
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CABLE v. THE CONTINENTAL AIRLINES LONG TERM DISABILITY GROUP INSURANCE POLICY et al
as 2:2010cv00961
Plaintiff:
PAMELA J. CABLE
Defendant:
THE CONTINENTAL AIRLINES LONG TERM DISABILITY GROUP INSURANCE POLICY, AETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY and CONTINENTAL AIRLINES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Cable v. Alabama Board of Pardons and Paroles et al (INMATE2)
as 2:2007cv00120
Plaintiff:
Anthony J. Cable
Defendant:
Alabama Board of Pardons and Paroles, Billy Mitchem and Troy King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
