Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Cacho v. RGH Enterprises
as 3:2026cv01973
Petitioner:
Joshua Cacho
Defendant:
RGH Enterprises doing business as Edgepark Medical Supplies
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Castillo-Castillo v. Blanche
as 26-1651
Petitioner:
DILTA ANEL CASTILLO-CASTILLO and HECTOR ISAAC CACHO-CASTILLO
Respondent:
TODD BLANCHE, ACTING UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Castillo Suazo v. Blanche
as 26-1546
Petitioner:
LAUREN DIXANY CASTILLO SUAZO, JOSE JAFED CASTILLO SUAZO and NIXON DAVID CACHO CASTILLO
Respondent:
TODD BLANCHE, ACTING UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 26-2243
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Maadanian, et al. v. Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC, et al.
as 26-2262
Plaintiff:
SEYYED JAVAD MAADANIAN, LEONARDO CACHO, WENDER JEUDY and others
Defendant:
MERCEDES-BENZ USA, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, MERCEDES-BENZ AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT, DOES 1-10 and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv02545
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Maqousi v. Centurion of Florida L.L.C. et al
as 3:2026cv00364
Plaintiff:
Imad Maqousi
Defendant:
Centurion of Florida L.L.C., MHM Health Professionals LLC, Esdra Jean-Baptiste, M.D. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Cacho v. National Debt Relief LLC
as 3:2026cv00310
Plaintiff:
Joshua Cacho
Defendant:
National Debt Relief LLC, Law Offices of Robert S. Gitmeid & Associates PLLC and Robert Stanley Gitmeid
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Cacho v. JGW Debt Settlement, LLC
as 3:2026cv00309
Plaintiff:
Joshua Cacho
Defendant:
JGW Debt Settlement, LLC, Arnold & Smith Law, PLLC, Todd W. Arnold and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
