Cases 1 - 10 of 99
Richard Silverberg v. DuPont De Nemours Inc, et al
as 24-1775
Plaintiff:
RICHARD J. SILVERBERG, Esq.
Defendant:
DUPONT DE NEMOURS INC, DOW INC, CORTEVA INC and others
SILVERBERG v. DUPONT DE NEMOURS INC. et al
as 2:2024cv00924
Plaintiff:
RICHARD J. SILVERBERG
Defendant:
DUPONT DE NEMOURS INC., DOW, INC., CORTEVA, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Urve Maggitti v. William Mahon, et al
as 23-3275
Plaintiff:
URVE MAGGITTI
Defendant:
WILLIAM P. MAHON, JOHN HALL, DEBRA TODD and others
Alan v. Farrell et al
as 6:2023cv06734
Plaintiff:
David P. Alan
Defendant:
Thomas J. Farrell, Esq., David N. Kaplan, CPA and Kenneth Perkins, Esq.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
MAGGITTI v. MAHON et al
as 2:2023cv04359
Plaintiff:
URVE MAGGITTI
Defendant:
WILLIAM P. MAHON, JOHN HALL, DEBRA TODD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
FARRELL v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv16163
Plaintiff:
JESSE J FARRELL
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Pircio v. City of Brockton et al
as 1:2023cv11893
Plaintiff:
Paul Pircio
Defendant:
City of Brockton, Raymond L. Parrett, Eric A. Burke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MAGGITTI v. HON. BRET M. BINDER et al
as 2:2023cv02273
Plaintiff:
URVE MAGGITTI
Defendant:
HON. BRET M. BINDER, HON. ANTHONY T. VERWEY, HON. WILLIAM P. MAHON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
FARRELL v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv07246
Plaintiff:
ERICA J FARRELL
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Bryan Booren, et al v. AELP Securitization Trust Seri, et al
as 21-35323
Defendant / Appellee:
MERSCORP HOLDINGS, INC., FAY SERVICING, LLC, MB LAW GROUP LLP and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRYAN BOOREN and SHARIN R. METCALF
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
