Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv00814
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Gallegos v. Davidson et al
as 5:2026cv01296
Plaintiff:
Marcus Roger Gallegos
Defendant:
John Davidson and Cameron Wayne Brockman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv02593
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Gerow v. DOJ - United States Department of Justice, et al.
as 26-4673
Defendant:
KEITH RICHERSON, DOJ - UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, UNKNOWN PARTIES, Jane or John Does 1-100 and others
Plaintiff:
ERIC GEROW
Gallegos v. Carter, et al.
as 26-4681
Plaintiff:
DAVID EARL RAY GALLEGOS
Defendant:
TRACI CARTER, Psychology Associate and JAYDAN ROMAN, Health Services Administrator
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv02557
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv02516
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv04444
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Gallegos v. Pasco Processing LLC
as 4:2026cv05112
Plaintiff:
Manuel Gallegos
Defendant:
Pasco Processing LLC and Does 1-20
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 fl FLSA: Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv02114
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.