Cases 1 - 10 of 35
MUSLIH et al v. COUNTY OF ESSEX et al
as 2:2020cv06694
Plaintiff:
ALIA MUSLIH, SOULAIHA MUSLIH and MUHAMMAD MUSLIH
Defendant:
THEODORE N STEPHENS II, ROBERT HARRIS, DARYL BROWN and others
Interested Party:
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Glover v. Regions Bank et al
as 2:2020cv00545
Defendant:
O.B. Grayson Hall, Jr, Regions Bank and B. Buczynski
Plaintiff:
Rodney J. Glover
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000
Vanous v. Ritter et al
as 5:2018cv00971
Defendant:
Captain John Ritter, J. Glover, Sergent FNU Payne and others
Plaintiff:
John Vanous
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Larry Sermeno v. Glover
as 1:2018cv00544
Plaintiff:
Larry Altamirano Sermeno
Defendant:
J. Glover
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Steven Charlot v. City of Houston, et al
as 17-20797
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEVEN R. CHARLOT
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF HOUSTON, OFFICER L. D. SMITH, SERGEANT FORD and others
Glover v. Sanofi US Services Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv14380
Plaintiff:
Velda J Glover
Defendant:
Sanofi US Services Inc., Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC, Sandoz, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rachel Lessem, et al v. Pfizer, Inc.
as 17-80180
Plaintiff - Respondent:
RACHEL LESSEM, an individual, KIM HOLLIMAN, an individual, DEBORA BROICH, as wife and as an individual and others
Defendant - Petitioner:
PFIZER, INC.
Rachel Lessem, et al v. Pfizer, Inc., et al
as 17-56294
Plaintiff - Appellee:
RACHEL LESSEM, an individual, KIM HOLLIMAN, an individual, DEBORA BROICH, as wife and as an individual and others
Defendant - Appellant:
PFIZER, INC.
Defendant:
MCKESSON CORPORATION and DOES, 1-50
Rachel Lessem et al v. Pfizer, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv02841
Plaintiff:
Jane E. Abbey, Hiawatha Barksdale, Margaret Beech and others
Defendant:
DOES, McKesson Corporation and Pfizer, Inc.
PUCILLO v. DUNLEAVY et al
as 3:2016cv03309
Plaintiff:
ANGELO PUCILLO
Defendant:
CHARLES DUNLEAVY, MARK A. FEATHERSTON, TERENCE J. CRYAN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
