Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Leon BrightIn re: Leon Bright
as 23-13749
Petitioner:
In re: LEON BRIGHT
Respondent:
CITY OF TAMPA, J. LAMBERT, CHRISTINA M. MITCHELL and others
Arbogast v. Pfizer, Inc., et al
as 23-1591
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRENT ANDREW BRACKETT ARBOGAST
Defendant / Appellee:
PFIZER, INC., SHEEHAN, PHINNEY, BASS & GREEN PA, JOHN J. BRACK and others
Dancer et al v. United States of America et al
as 1:2023cv00580
Plaintiff:
Tyler Dancer, Deann Winfield, Shaprace Stegall and others
Defendant:
United States of America, Debra Shore, Marta Fuoco and others
Arbogast v. Pfizer, Inc., et al
as 23-1481
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRENT ARBOGAST and BRENT ANDREW BRACKETT ARBOGAST
Defendant / Appellee:
PFIZER, INC., SHEEHAN, PHINNEY, BASS & GREEN PA, JOHN J. BRACK and others
Arbogast v. Pfizer et al
as 1:2022cv10156
Plaintiff:
Brent A. Arbogast and Pro se Litigant Brent A. Arbogast
Defendant:
Pfizer, Sheehan, Phinney, Bass & Green, P.A., John J. Brack and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Andrew Lambert, Jr. v. Connie Horton
as 21-1757
Petitioner / Appellant:
ANDREW J. LAMBERT, JR.
Respondent / Appellee:
CONNIE HORTON, Warden
Danny Popov, et al v. Nuvasive, Inc., et al
as 17-80055
Plaintiff - Respondent:
DANNY POPOV, Individually and on Behalf of All Other Persons Similarly Situated and BRAD MAUSS, Individually and on Behalf of All Other Persons Similarly Situated
Defendant - Petitioner:
NUVASIVE, INC., ALEXIS V. LUKIANOV and MICHAEL J. LAMBERT
In re: Andrew Lambert, Jr.
as 15-1084
Movant:
In re: ANDREW J. LAMBERT, JR.
Respondent:
RANDALL HAAS, Warden
Lambert v. Zimmer Inc. et al
as MN/0:14-cv-04267
Plaintiff:
Patrick J. Lambert
Defendant:
Zimmer Inc. , Zimmer Holdings, Inc. , Zimmer Production Inc. and others
Mauss v. Nuvasive, Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv02005
Plaintiff:
Danny Popov
Defendant:
Nuvasive, Inc., Alexis V. Lukianov, Kevin C. O'Boyle and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
