Cases 11 - 20 of 97
Joseph Johnson v. A. Meyer, et al
as 22-16160
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOSEPH JAMAUL JOHNSON
Defendant / Appellee:
A. MEYER, Lt., A. MEDEN, Correctional Officer II, J. MARTINES, Correctional Officer II and others
Martin v. Juul Labs, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv02985
Plaintiff:
Breon J. Martin
Defendant:
Juul Labs, Inc., Altria Group, Inc., Philip Morris USA, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Maurice C. Baugh v. J. Martin et al
as 2:2022cv02342
Plaintiff:
Maurice C. Baugh
Defendant:
J. Martin, Laskowski, Christine Winn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martin v. Kijakazi
as 1:2022cv00094
Plaintiff:
Rhonda J Martin
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Hicks v. Strange et al
as 2:2022cv00284
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Lee Hicks, II
Defendant:
Cheryl Strange, J Martin, A Wantanabe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martin v. Fernandez et al
as 2:2021cv00278
Plaintiff:
Sean Kyle Martin
Defendant:
H Fernandez, B Longino, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Linda Martin, et al v. CIR
as 21-71240
Petitioner / Appellant:
LINDA J. MARTIN and JOHN A. MARTIN
Respondent / Appellee:
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
Ahjeeb Jamal Boyd Jr. v. Neil McDowell
as 2:2021cv05616
Plaintiff:
Ahjeeb Jamal Boyd, Jr.
Defendant:
Neil McDowell, E. Winbush, F. Duenas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Wimberly v. J. Martin et al
as 2:2021cv05494
Plaintiff:
Michael Lewis Wimberly
Defendant:
Correctional Officer J. Martin, Sergeant D. Bolton and Associate Warden K. McQuaid
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Uselton v. Shinn et al
as 2:2020cv02141
Defendant:
David Shinn, Centurian Managed Care, E Rodriguez and others
Plaintiff:
John Stevenson Uselton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
