Cases 11 - 20 of 117
Bravenec v. Martin
as 22-50822
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Edward Bravenec, et al.
Defendant / Appellant:
Rowland J. Martin, Jr.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01296
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Bexar County, et al. v. Martin
as 5:2022cv00374
Plaintiff:
Bexar County, et al.
Defendant:
Rowland J. Martin, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Foreclosure
Edward Bravenec, et al. v. Martin
as 5:2022cv00522
Plaintiff:
Edward Bravenec, et al.
Defendant:
Rowland J. Martin, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - 42:1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv01064
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Lee v. Martin et al
as 2:2022cv00044
Plaintiff:
Harold Lee
Defendant:
Seth J. Martin, Old Republic Insurance Company, Liberty Mutual Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Carter v. Orleans Parish Sheriff's Office et al
as 2:2022cv00241
Plaintiff:
Kerry Ray Carter
Defendant:
Orleans Parish Sheriff's Office, M Gusman, J Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garrison v. Orleans Parish Sheriff's Office et al
as 2:2022cv00393
Plaintiff:
Darius Jamal Garrison
Defendant:
Orleans Parish Sheriff's Office, M Gusman, J Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bryant v. Seaton et al
as 5:2021cv00863
Plaintiff:
Kerwin Bryant
Defendant:
J. Seaton, J. Martin, C. Nelson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor v. B & J Martin
as 21-30347
Defendant / Appellee:
Corey T. Gardiner, Rooster Oil & Gas, L.L.C., Lege's Consulting Services, L.L.C. and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Allen Taylor
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
