Cases 1 - 10 of 118
Parents Protecting Our Children, UA v. Eau Claire Area School District, Wisconsin et al
as 3:2022cv00508
Plaintiff:
Parents Protecting Our Children, UA
Defendant:
Eau Claire Area School District, Wisconsin, Tim Nordin, Lori Bica and others
Amicus Curiae:
Kristoffer J. Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Washington v. State of Texas et al
as 3:2023cv00038
Plaintiff:
Jacque Kenshashwa Washington
Defendant:
State of Texas, City of Freeport, Texas, Brazoria County Court at Law #4 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-30767
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv01968
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Bravenec v. Martin
as 22-2191
Plaintiff / Appellee:
EDWARD BRAVENEC, et al.
Defendant / Appellant:
ROWLAND J. MARTIN, JR.
Bravenec v. Martin
as 22-50822
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Edward Bravenec, et al.
Defendant / Appellant:
Rowland J. Martin, Jr.
Shekhem El Bey v. State of New York
as 22-59
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Yashua Amen Shekhem El Bey
Defendant / Appellee:
State of New York, Andrew M. Cuomo, New York State Department of Taxation and Finance and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01296
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Edward Bravenec, et al. v. Martin
as 5:2022cv00522
Plaintiff:
Edward Bravenec, et al.
Defendant:
Rowland J. Martin, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - 42:1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv01064
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
