Cases 61 - 70 of 137
Nathaniel Jackson v. David Willis, et al
as 14-2589
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NATHANIEL JACKSON
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID WILLIS, Lieutenant and EDDIE J. PAYNE
Branch Banking and Trust Company v. Dockery Park, LLC et al
as 1:2014cv01162
Plaintiff:
Branch Banking and Trust Company
Defendant:
Dockery Park, LLC, David P. Smith, Thomas J. Payne and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cooper v. Sowers et al
as 1:2013cv03872
Plaintiff:
Robert Cooper
Defendant:
Roderick R. Sowers, J Michael Stouffer, Bobby P. Shearin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Childs v. Cate et al
as 3:2013cv02633
Plaintiff:
Earl Childs, Jr.
Defendant:
Matthew Cate, Paramo, Hernandez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Payne v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv26733
Plaintiff:
Frances J. Payne
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. , Ethicon, LLC , Johnson & Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Payne et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv25195
Plaintiff:
Laurel J. Payne and David Payne
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Payne et al v. Mentor Worldwide LLC et al
as WVS/2:13-cv-22487
Plaintiff:
Wanda J. Payne and James Robert Payne
Defendant:
Mentor Worldwide LLC and Coloplast Corp.
Payne et al v. Mentor Worldwide LLC et al
as 2:2013cv22487
Plaintiff:
Wanda J. Payne and James Robert Payne
Defendant:
Mentor Worldwide LLC and Coloplast Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Payne, et al v. Merck & Co, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv03927
Defendant:
Merck & Co., Inc. and Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.
Plaintiff:
Johnnie B. Payne, Jr. and Wendy J Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Payne, et al v. Merck & Co, Inc. et al
as NYE/1:13-cv-03927
Plaintiff:
Johnnie B. Payne, Jr. and Wendy J Payne
Defendant:
Merck & Co. , Inc. and Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
