Cases 21 - 30 of 68
Meyers v. Williams et al
as 7:2021cv00200
Defendant:
Patricia Connor, Circuit Judge Neimeyer, Circuit Judge Motz and others
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Randolph
as 1:2021cv01321
Defendant:
Richard J. Randolph, III
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Meyers v. Perry et al
as 2:2021cv00031
Defendant:
Ofc. Cornelius Bland, Officer Mr. Lockhart, Ofc. Ms. Bernard and others
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Meyers v. Roundtree et al
as 2:2021cv00010
Defendant:
E.P. Witt, Ivan Gilmore, Martin Bryant and others
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. ONE BOYERTOWN PROPERTIES LP et al
as 5:2020cv06249
Defendant:
CARE HSL NEWTOWN PROPCO, LP, J. RANDOLPH PARRY ARCHITECTS, P.C., AMC DELANCEY TRADITIONS OF HERSHEY PARTNERS, LP and others
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
3Rd Party Defendant:
Roy Larry Schein & Associates, Hospitaler Sisters of Mercy, CCA, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
Randolph v. The Intersect Group, LLC
as 1:2020cv02826
Plaintiff:
Jamie J. Randolph
Defendant:
The Intersect Group, LLC
RANDOLPH v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv13197
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DENNIS J RANDOLPH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rubin v. Access National Corporation et al
as 1:2018cv01563
Defendant:
Mary Leigh McDaniel, Janet A. Neuharth, Access National Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Rubin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Parshall v. Access National Corporation et al
as 3:2018cv00862
Defendant:
Mary Leigh McDaniel, Janet A. Neuharth, Access National Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Paul Parshall
Randolph, Jr. v. USA
as 3:2018cv00654
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Anthony J. Randolph, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
