Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Pamela Simmons v. Riverside County Sheriff's Department, et al
as 2:2021cv08248
Petitioner:
Riverside County Sheriff Deparment and MS. Pamela J Simmons
Plaintiff:
Pamela Simmons
Defendant:
Riverside County Sheriff's Department and Does 1-100
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bonilla v. Simmons et al
as 3:2020cv00981
Defendant:
John Morrill, J. Simmons and J. Olsen
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Mack v. Martinez et al
as 3:2019cv02166
Defendant:
Bryaton + Ducell, Ray Thornton, Stacey L. Montgomery and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Mack
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Mendel v. Chao
as 4:2019cv03244
Plaintiff:
S. Patrick Mendel and Sameh Fahmi Moustafa
Defendant:
Elaine Chao, Raiser-CA, LLC, Ryan Graves and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bonilla v. Battaglia et al
as 3:2019cv00466
Defendant:
Anthony Houston, J. Simmons, William Hays and others
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Simmons v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2018cv03828
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Carla J Simmons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Simmons v. State of Washington
as 2:2018cv00982
Respondent:
State of Washington
Petitioner:
Jeremy J. Simmons and Jeremy Simmons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Simmons v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2016cv03842
Plaintiff:
Thomas J Simmons
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
James E Nobles v. Carrollton TX Police Dept et al
as 2:2013cv05367
Defendant:
Carrollton TX, Carrollton TX Police Dept, Dr Manuel Griego, Jr and others
Plaintiff:
James E Nobles
James E Nobles v. James Staney et al
as 2:2013cv03540
Defendant:
Dr Larry W Blackburn, Manuel Griego, Jr, Dr F J Simmons and others
Plaintiff:
James E Nobles
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
