Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Rishard Amadi Salaam et al v. Glen E. Pratt et al
as 5:2024cv01568
Defendant:
Howard E. Moseley, Fernando Franco, R. Rusow and others
Plaintiff:
Rishard H. Amadi Salaam
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HARVIN et al v. CARVANA LLC et al
as 2:2023cv02068
Plaintiff:
SYRETTA ANGELIQUE HARVIN, DAVID WEAVER, JR, JOSEPH A RIEDEL and others
Defendant:
CARVANA LLC, BRIDGECREST CREDIT COMPANY LLC, ALLY BANK and others
Thorne v. Norman et al
as 2:2021cv04190
Plaintiff:
Timothy James Thorne and Timothy J Thorne
Defendant:
Jeff Norman, Tabatha (unknown), Sgt (unknown) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thorne et al v. Crane Co. et al
as 1:2020cv00419
Defendant:
Johnson Controls, Inc., Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, Trane U.S. Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Rickey Thorne and Barbara J. Thorne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Thorne v. Howmedica Osteonics Corporation et al
as 4:2018cv00422
Defendant:
Stryker Corporation, Howmedica Osteonic Corporation and Howmedica Osteonics Corporation
Plaintiff:
William J Thorne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Humes v. Cummings et al
as 2:2018cv02123
Plaintiff:
Veronica Humes
Defendant:
Edward T. Cummings, David Lathrop, Megan Mance and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thorne v. Steele
as 4:2018cv00123
Petitioner:
Timothy J. Thorne, Sr.
Respondent:
Troy Steele
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Thorne v. Steele
as 4:2017cv01651
Petitioner:
Timothy J. Thorne, Sr.
Respondent:
Troy Steele
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Thorne v. Steele
as 4:2015cv01547
Petitioner:
Timothy J. Thorne
Defendant:
Troy Steele
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Markel Insurance Company v. The Learning Academy, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv01344
Plaintiff:
Markel Insurance Company
Defendant:
Learning Academy, Inc, The, Children Are The Future, Inc., Emmanuel J. Thorne and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
