Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company v. Oliver
as 23-897
Plaintiff:
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
Defendant / Appellee:
David M. Oliver, James W. Oliver, Barbara Forth and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Paul R. Webb, III and Thomas J. Webb, Individually and as Executor of the Estate of Paul R. Webb, II
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company v. Oliver et al
as 1:2020cv01351
Plaintiff:
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
Defendant:
James W. Oliver, Barbara Forth, Thomas J. Webb and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company v. Oliver et al
as 1:2020cv10479
Plaintiff:
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
Defendant:
James W. Oliver, Thomas J. Webb, Paul R. Webb, III and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Webb v. Walgreens Co., et al.
as 3:2017cv00662
Plaintiff:
Tammy J Webb
Defendant:
Walgreens Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Webb v. Squire Patton Boggs Long-Term Disability Plan et al
as 1:2016cv00769
Plaintiff:
Nicole J Webb
Defendant:
Squire Patton Boggs Long-Term Disability Plan, Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP and Prudential Insurance Company of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001
WEBB v. THE PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2014cv00881
Defendant:
SQUIRE, SANDERS & DEMPSEY LLP DISABILITY PLAN and THE PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
Plaintiff:
NICOLE J WEBB
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Trustees of the Chicago Regional Council of Carpenters Pension Fund et al v. International Scaffold Erectors, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv08169
Plaintiff:
Trustees of the Chicago Regional Council of Carpenters Pension Fund , Chicago Regional Council of Carpenters Supplemental Retirement Fund , Chicago Regional Council of Carpenters Welfare Fund and others
Defendant:
International Scaffold Erectors, Inc. and David J. Webb
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
