Cases 11 - 20 of 35
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2016cv03040
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
McCrea et al v. Syngenta Corporation et al
as ILC/1:15-cv-01465
Plaintiff:
Arthur McCrea , Albert Larry Hill , Aldine M. Young and others
Defendant:
Syngenta Corporation , Syngenta Crop Protection AG , Syngenta AG and others
Gordon et al v. Flagstar Bank, FSB et al
as 3:2015cv01314
Plaintiff:
Martinique E Gordon , Verol D Gordon , Susan R Wolf and others
Defendant:
Flagstar Bank, FSB and Flagstar Reinsurance Company
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Wolf et al v. Schadegg et al
as 1:2015cv01035
Plaintiff:
David J. Wolf and Wolf Auto Center Sterling, LLC
Defendant:
Michael Schadegg and Shawn Cochran
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1030
Michael Wolfe v. Armando Rodriguez, et al
as 15-10046
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL J. WOLFE
Defendant - Appellee:
ARMANDO RODRIGUEZ and DEBORAH CORN
Michael Wolfe v. Armando Rodriguez, et al
as 14-90016
Petitioner:
MICHAEL J. WOLFE
Respondent:
ARMANDO RODRIGUEZ and DEBORAH CORN
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2014cv00102
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jose Morales v. USDC-CAOAK
as 14-70615
:
In re: JOSE LUIS MORALES
Petitioner:
JOSE LUIS MORALES
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, OAKLAND
Real Party In Interest:
J. WOLF, SUE RISENHOOVER, GREGORY DUNCAN, Dr. and others
Wolfe et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc. et al
as MN/0:13-cv-01849
Plaintiff:
LaWanda J. Wolfe and Frank E. Wolfe
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc. and C.R. Bard Inc.
In re: Anthony Lewi
as 13-1225
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
In re: ANTHONY RUSHAN LEWIS
Defendant - Respondent:
WOLFE, Correction Officer, DISTRICT ATTORNEY LANCASTER COUNTY, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
