Cases 11 - 20 of 94
HAZLETT v. J.M. DAUGHTERY INDUSTRIES, LLC et al
as 2:2021cv01638
Plaintiff:
JACOB HAZLETT
Defendant:
J.M. DAUGHTERY INDUSTRIES, LLC doing business as MISTER SEWER and JASON DAUGHERTY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv01539
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1401
POPLAWSKI v. VILARINO et al
as 2:2021cv03084
Defendant:
JAYMMIE M. VILARINO, J.M. POPLAWSKI, HON. JOSH SHAPIRO and others
Plaintiff:
RICHARD A. POPLAWSKI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rosario et al v. Metromile Insurance Services, LLC et al
as 5:2021cv02878
Defendant:
Metromile, Inc. and Metromile Insurance Services, LLC
Plaintiff:
Gladys Rosario as p/n/g of J.M. and Gladys Rosario
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Kingston v. Clark(c)TM et al
as 1:2021cv00031
Respondent:
Pharmatech Laboratory, C.O.1 Bullick, Fidel Clark(c)TM and others
Petitioner:
Roalston Stevenson Kingston
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
MAY v. BRADLEY et al
as 3:2020cv00047
Defendant:
COUNSELOR M. NAGLIC, CASE MANAGER J. SPEILVOGEL, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER GORAL and others
Plaintiff:
RUSSELL THOMAS MAY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Kingston v. Clark(c)TM et al
as 1:2020cv00370
Defendant:
CO 1 L.M. McGinnis, Gregory Redden, CO 1 Kyler and others
Plaintiff:
Roalston Stevenson Kingston
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
J.M. v. STEVENSON et al
as 5:2019cv06005
Defendant:
TONYA EVANS, TRACY KAUFFMAN, MARK KERN and others
Plaintiff:
J.M.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
J.M. v. STEVENSON et al
as 5:2019cv00802
Defendant:
TONYA EVANS, TRACY KAUFFMAN, MARK KERN and others
Plaintiff:
J.M.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
J.M. v. STEVENSON et al
as 5:2018cv05026
Defendant:
TONYA EVANS, JUSTIN WILLIAMS, TRACY KAUFFMAN and others
Plaintiff:
J.M.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
