Cases 1 - 10 of 17
WARDLOW SR. v. FAW et al
as 1:2023cv00850
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL LEWIS WARDLOW, SR.
Defendant:
C.J. FAW, D.W. COPPOLA, J.M. REYES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BANKS v. ROGERS et al
as 1:2022cv00602
Petitioner:
MITCHELL DANYELL BANKS
Respondent:
DANNY ROGERS, D.W. COOKE, W.M. EVANS and others
Defendant:
TRAVELERS CASUALTY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wake County Board of Education v. D.M. et al
as 5:2021cv00409
Plaintiff:
Wake County Board of Education
Defendant:
J.M., D.M. and G.M.
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv00344
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1415
LEYSEN v. AMERISOURCEBERGEN DRUG CORPORATION et al
as 1:2020cv00183
Defendant:
ASSOCIATED PHARMACIES, INC., BEVERLY SACKLER, MALLINCKRODT, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Patty Carol Leysen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
STEVENS v. AMERISOURCEBERGEN DRUG CORPORATION et al
as 1:2020cv00139
Defendant:
THE NORTH CAROLINA MUTUAL WHOLESALE DRUG COMPANY, BEVERLY SACKLER, RITE AID CORPORATION and others
Plaintiff:
SUSAN K. STEVENS, ADMINISTRATRIX OF THE ESTATE OF TORIA CAPRI STEVENS and SUSAN K. STEVENS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
JONES v. ALVAREZ et al
as 1:2019cv00930
Defendant:
S.A. ALVAREZ, F.T. WRIGHT, WAYNE SCOTT and others
Plaintiff:
ZARED KINAH JONES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McLean v. Ammons et al
as 5:2018ct03288
Defendant:
Officer T. Smith, Judge Thomas D. Haigwood, J.M. Ray and others
Plaintiff:
Habimana Lisimba McLean
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Blow v. Harris et al
as 5:2018ct03013
Plaintiff:
Ivan Blow
Defendant:
J.M. Harris and Sgt. Hodge
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Craveiro v. Stewart et al
as 5:2016ct03158
Plaintiff:
Joseph M. Craveiro
Defendant:
A. Stewart, J.M. Jackson and C. H. Graves
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
