Cases 1 - 10 of 34
Warner v. Connecticut State Department of Revenue Services
as 8:2023cv02967
Plaintiff:
Blake Warner
Defendant:
Connecticut State Department of Revenue Services, J.P. Morgan Chase Bank N.A. and William Clato-Day
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01898
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12131 Americans with Disabilities
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv05082
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00259
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Wells-Pruitt v. City of Girard, et al
as 4:2020cv00291
Defendant:
City of Girard, Chief of Police, Scott Siegel and others
Plaintiff:
Delshawn Wells-Pruitt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FARZAN v. J.P. MORGAN CHASE BANK N.A. et al
as 3:2019cv05156
Defendant:
STACY E. SPOHN, MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS INC., J.P. MORGAN CHASE BANK N.A. and others
Plaintiff:
REZA FARZAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Carter v. J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
as 1:2018cv07088
Plaintiff:
Thomas John Carter
Defendant:
J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2018cv00389
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Thomas Carter v. J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., et al
as 17-1801
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS JOHN CARTER
Defendant - Appellee:
J.P. MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. and UNITED STATES SECURITY ASSOCIATES, INC.
TRUSLEY v. J.P. MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., EMC et al
as 1:2017cv00108
Defendant:
J.P MORGAN SECURITIES and J.P. MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., EMC
Plaintiff:
JAMIE TRUSLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
