Cases 31 - 40 of 207
Williams v. Ritts et al
as 1:2022cv00254
Plaintiff:
Isiah Williams
Defendant:
James B. Ritts, Todd Baxter, Mark E. Monaghan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02297
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1415 IDEA: Challenge decision re education for handicapped
Jones v. Reis et al
as 1:2022cv00545
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Jones
Defendant:
Brian Reis, Chris Van Wagenen, Marshall Currier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CARNEVALE v. DIGIOVANNI et al
as 2:2022cv00341
Plaintiff:
DANIEL CARNEVALE
Defendant:
JENNIFER DIGIOVANNI, SCOTT EVANS and J.R. SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WALL v. GULLEDGE et al
as 1:2022cv00031
Plaintiff:
FELISHA WALL
Defendant:
MARK GULLEDGE, J.R. DENNIS SMITH, JAMES P. DAVIS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv11150
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400 IDEA: Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (short title)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2021cv82141
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv09632
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1415
B.B. et al v. Hochul et al
as 1:2021cv06229
Plaintiff:
B.B., T.R., M.P. and others
Defendant:
Kathy Hochul, Sheila J. Poole and City of New York
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv01752
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Guardian Ad Litem:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
