Cases 11 - 20 of 29
Jacobson Capital Services, Inc v. Berwick Offray, LLC
as 1:2015cv06270
Plaintiff:
Jacobson Capital Services, Inc
Defendant:
Berwick Offray, LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Magder v. Lee et al
as 1:2014cv08461
Plaintiff:
Andrea Magder
Defendant:
Belton Lee , Madhattan Film Company Global, LLC , Christopher Bongirne and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Shenzhen Liown Electronics Co., Ltd. v. Luminara Worldwide, LLC et al
as 0:2014cv03112
Plaintiff:
Shenzhen Liown Electronics Co., Ltd.
Defendant:
Luminara Worldwide, LLC , Michael L. O'Shaughnessy , John W. Jacobson and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
Jacobson Capital Services, Inc. v. Sears Holdings Corporation et al
as 1:2014cv05727
Plaintiff:
Jacobson Capital Services, Inc.
Defendant:
Sears Holdings Corporation and K Mart Corporation
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Jacobson Capital Services, Inc v. Coquette International
as 1:2014cv01893
Plaintiff:
Jacobson Capital Services, Inc
Defendant:
Coquette International
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Breadmore et al v. Jacobson
as 4:2013cv00361
Plaintiff:
Patrick Scott Breadmore and Galen Blom
Defendant:
James Jacobson
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Rogers v. Boston Pads, LLC et al
as 1:2011cv11890
Plaintiff:
Richard Rogers
Defendant:
Michael Swann, Lakeya Rochelle, Gustavo Payano and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 504
SAEILO ENTERPRISES, INC. v. JACOBSON HAT COMPANY, INC.
as 1:2011cv01383
Defendant:
JACOBSON HAT COMPANY, INC.
Plaintiff:
SAEILO ENTERPRISES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Matthew Jones v. Dirt Blossom Inc et al
as 2:2011cv07317
Defendant:
Dirt Blossom Inc, Does, David Jacobson and others
Plaintiff:
Matthew Jones
Phish, Inc. vs. Jerry Hector, et al
as 7:2011cv03379
Plaintiff:
Phish, Inc.
Defendant:
Jerry Hector, Glen Bernstein, James Bernstein and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
