Cases 1 - 10 of 45
BRANSTETTER v. USA
as 1:2026cv01250
Plaintiff:
JADI BRANSTETTER
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
VALENTINE v. GRIMLEY et al
as 1:2026cv11007
Plaintiff:
JADIS VALENTINE
Defendant:
JAMES P GRIMLEY, TODD MILLER and JOESPH LEVIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv01314
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Hodge v. Easy Road Policy LLC
as 2:2026cv02045
Plaintiff:
Jady Hodge
Defendant:
Easy Road Policy LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Hodge v. Sherwood Ventures, LLC
as 2:2026at00945
Plaintiff:
Jady Hodge
Defendant:
Sherwood Ventures, LLC Doing business as BullseyeTrades
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Branstetter (PS) v. Weinner et al
as 1:2026cv01441
Plaintiff:
Jadi Branstetter
Defendant:
Talia Weinner, Ben Berube, Gabe Goodwin, Sr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2025cv01998
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relations
SS v. Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 1:2024cv07198
Defendant:
Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, Qiqi jewelry, Xiangzhe2206 and others
Plaintiff:
Sehreen Shahzad
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Dawson v. Sargus et al
as 2:2024cv02175
Plaintiff:
William T. Dawson, Jr.
Defendant:
Judge Edmund A Sargus, Jr, Christin Werner, Chief Judge Algenon L. Marbley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
MARSHALL v. PATTERSON
as 1:2024cv04516
Plaintiff:
KYWAN MARSHALL and JADIS VALENTINE
Defendant:
ROBERT PATTERSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
