Cases 1 - 10 of 40
James Glover v. City of Philadelphia, et al
as 24-1479
Plaintiff:
JAMES L. GLOVER
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA DEPARTMENT OF LAW, UNKNOWN CITY EMPLOYEES and others
James Glover v. Scott Fidaannd, et al
as 23-3103
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES L. GLOVER
Defendant:
SCOTT FIDAANND, CHIEF OF POLICE AGENCY HEAD, HORSHAM POLICE DEPARTMENT and OFFICER BONITA RODRIGUEZ, AND OTHER OFFICERS INVOLVED
GLOVER v. JACOBS et al
as 2:2023cv03686
Plaintiff:
JAMES L. GLOVER
Defendant:
LT. BARRY JACOBS, DOUGLAS K. MORRISON, JR., RUSSELL CROTTS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GLOVER v. OLEYN
as 2:2023cv03688
Plaintiff:
JAMES L. GLOVER
Defendant:
OFFICER OLEYN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GLOVER v. OUTLAW et al
as 2:2023cv02057
Plaintiff:
JAMES L. GLOVER
Defendant:
DANIEL OUTLAW, PHILADELPHIA POLICE DEPARTMENT and OFFICER OLEYN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GLOVER v. FIDAAND et al
as 2:2023cv02056
Plaintiff:
JAMES L. GLOVER
Defendant:
SCOTT FIDAAND, HORSHAM POLICE DEPARTMENT and OFFICER BONITA RODRIGUEZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
GLOVER v. OUTLAW et al
as 2:2023cv02058
Plaintiff:
JAMES L. GLOVER
Defendant:
DANIEL OUTLAW, PHILADELPHIA POLICE DEPARTMENT, OFFICE MOFFA NICHOLES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
James Glover v. United States Postal Service, et al
as 22-3234
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES L. GLOVER
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE and POSTMASTER GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES
US v. James Glover, Jr.
as 20-7328
Defendant / Appellant:
JAMES ROLLINS GLOVER, JR.
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Glover v. Harris County District Attorney's Office et al
as 4:2020cv02355
Defendant:
Harris County, David Ryan and Harris County District Attorney's Office
Plaintiff:
James S. Glover
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
