Cases 11 - 20 of 781
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00789
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Johnson v. Reyna et.al.
as 3:2024cv01004
Plaintiff:
Mr. James Johnson and Mr. James C Johnson
Defendant:
Renee C. Reyna and San Mateo County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00711
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Johnson v. Berry
as 4:2024cv00038
Petitioner:
James A. Johnson
Respondent:
Walter Berry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00092
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Johnson v. USA
as 3:2024cv00010
Petitioner:
James Michael Johnson
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
TATUM v. BIDEN et al
as 1:2024cv00033
Plaintiff:
THOMAS TATUM
Defendant:
JOSEPH BIDEN, METROPOLITAN POLICE, DANIEL THAU and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
VARGO v. WILLIAMS et al
as 1:2024cv00010
Plaintiff:
DERRICK VARGO
Defendant:
BRYANT WILLIAMS and JAMES MICHAEL JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
WHITE v. BAGSHAW et al
as 1:2024cv00018
Plaintiff:
VICTORIA CHARITY WHITE
Defendant:
JASON BAGSHAW, NEIL MCALLISTER and JAMES MICHAEL JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Fenelon et al v. Housing & Urban Development et al
as 5:2023cv01717
Plaintiff:
Cheryl L Fenelon and Barbara Fenelon Jackson
Defendant:
U S Dept of Housing & Urban Development, U S Dept of Justice, James Michael Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
