Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Davis v. Chisholm et al
as 2:2023cv00494
Petitioner:
Glenn M Davis
Respondent:
John Chisholm, James J Martin, Laura Arbuckle and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MARTIN v. JOHNSON MEMORIAL HEALTH PHYSICIAN NETWORK, LLC
as 1:2021cv02653
Plaintiff:
JAMES A. MARTIN
Defendant:
JOHNSON MEMORIAL HEALTH PHYSICIAN NETWORK, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MARTIN v. COLVIN
as 3:2015cv00152
Defendant:
CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Plaintiff:
JAMES D. MARTIN
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only) and USM (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 rs Review of HHS Decision (RSI)
MARTIN v. MEDICAL INFORMATICS ENGINEERING, INC.
as 1:2015cv01341
Plaintiff:
JAMES A. MARTIN
Defendant:
MEDICAL INFORMATICS ENGINEERING, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Carapella v. On-The-Go Sports, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv09100
Plaintiff:
Courtney Carapella
Defendant:
On-The-Go Sports, Inc. and James Christopher Martin
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Tyrone Hines v. James Martin
as 13-1415
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TYRONE HINES
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES F. MARTIN
MARTIN v. ASTRUE
as 3:2012cv00025
Defendant:
MICHAEL J ASTRUE
Plaintiff:
JAMES D MARTIN
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Hines v. Martin et al
as 1:2011cv06389
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Hines
Defendant:
James F Martin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
HOWARD v. BRILES et al
as 1:2010cv01164
Defendant:
SHAWN BRILES, JOHN LARSON, WILLIAM T. LAWRENCE and others
Plaintiff:
JASON R. HOWARD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARTIN v. MARTIN et al
as 1:2010cv01112
Defendant:
MARION COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT, JAMES E. MARTIN and STEAK N SHAKE OPERATIONS, INC.
Plaintiff:
GARY L. MARTIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
