Cases 21 - 30 of 124
Martin v. Warden of FCI Hazelton and unknowns et al
as 3:2022cv00013
Plaintiff:
James A. Martin
Defendant:
Warden of FCI Hazelton and unknowns and Warden of USP Hazelton and unknowns
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00022
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
LOPEZ v. CITY OF LEHIGH COUNTY et al
as 5:2021cv04388
Plaintiff:
GEORGE IVAN LOPEZ
Defendant:
CITY OF LEHIGH COUNTY, JAMES B. MARTIN, JOSH SHAPIRO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RIVERA v. MASON et al
as 5:2021cv03754
Petitioner:
ROBERT RIVERA, JR.
Respondent:
BERNADETTE MASON, JAMES B. MARTIN, JOSH SHAPIRO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Martin v Director, TDCJ-CID
as 1:2021cv00081
Plaintiff:
James L Martin
Defendant:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Washington v. Lehigh County District Attorney's Office et al
as 5:2021cv00159
Defendant:
Heather Gallagher, Esq., (DISTRICT ATTORNEY) JAMES B MARTIN and LEHIGH COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE
Plaintiff:
Milton Washington
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martin v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 1:2020cv00225
Respondent:
John R Lopez and Director, TDCJ-CID
Petitioner:
James L Martin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
MARTIN v. MERRELL et al
as 5:2020cv00393
Plaintiff:
JAMES M MARTIN
Defendant:
CRISP REGIONAL HOSPITAL, JAMES HINTON, DEPUTY WARDEN SHENGCA KING and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MARTIN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2020cv03503
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff:
JAMES E. MARTIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Jackson v. City of Las Cruces et al
as 1:2019cv00767
Defendant:
Officer R Lattura, Thomas Medina, Third Judicial District Court and others
Plaintiff:
Charles B Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
