Cases 1 - 10 of 14
MOUNTAIN VALLEY PIPELINE, LLC v. EASEMENTS TO CONSTRUCT, OPERATE, AND MAINTAIN A NATURAL GAS PIPELINE OVER TRACTS OF LAND IN ROCKINGHAM COUNTY, GUILFORD AND ALAMANCE COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA INCLUDING:
as 1:2021cv00047
Defendant:
1.93 Acres of Land Owned by John Ray Cole and Ravonda Lynn Cole, 9.74 Acres of Land Owned by Jackie Burris Johnson And Ted Mack Johnson And Easement Claimed By Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC, 0.06 Acres of Land Owned by Susano B. Jaimes and others
Plaintiff:
Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717 Natural Gas Act
Judd v. USA
as 5:2020cv00172
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
James Arthur Judd
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Judd v. United States of America
as 5:2019hc02109
Petitioner:
James Arthur Judd
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
United States v. $33,313.00 in U.S. Currency
as 5:2019cv00118
Plaintiff:
United States and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
$33,313.00 in U.S. Currency
Claimant:
James Arthur McIntyre, Bobby McIntyre and Lester Williams, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
Judd v. USA
as 5:2019cv00088
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
James Arthur Judd
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Judd v. Crumley et al
as 5:2019ct03044
Plaintiff:
James Arthur Judd
Defendant:
Alexandr F. Crumley, Robert J. Higdon, Jr., Mitchell G. Styers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Judd v. United States
as 5:2019hc02021
Petitioner:
James Arthur Judd
Respondent:
United States
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Acklin v. USA
as 4:2016cv00168
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
James Arthur Acklin , Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Acklin v. USA
as 4:2014cv00222
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
James Arthur Acklin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
WARD v. LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA
as 1:2012cv01068
Plaintiff:
JAMES ARTHUR WARD, JR.
Defendant:
LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
