Cases 1 - 10 of 12
CALDWELL v. VIGO COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT et al
as 2:2019cv00526
Defendant:
VIGO COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, VIGO COUNTY DCS, HALEY LINDLEY and others
Plaintiff:
DAKOTA JAMES CALDWELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CALDWELL v. VIGO COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT et al
as 2:2019cv00158
Plaintiff:
DAKOTA JAMES CALDWELL
Defendant:
VIGO COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, SWEENY-MCBRIDE and PIRTLE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv01617
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2018cv00101
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Caldwell v. Sessions et al
as 4:2018cv01719
Plaintiff:
Daniel James Caldwell
Defendant:
Jefferson Sessions and Kirstien Nielsen
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241
Tony Chaney v. Louisiana Work Force Cmsn, et al
as 13-31138
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TONY CHANEY
Defendant - Appellee:
LOUISIANA WORKFORCE COMMISSION, LOUISIANA ATTORNEY GENERAL OFFICE, JAMES CALDWELL, Director, also known as Buddy and others
Chaney v. Louisiana Work Force Commission et al
as 3:2013cv00241
Defendant:
James Caldwell, Louisiana Attorney General Office, Louisiana Work Force Commission and others
Plaintiff:
Tony Chaney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
GUY et al v. CUMBERLAND POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2012cv00455
Defendant:
JAMES CALDWELL, MICHAEL P. CROOKE and CUMBERLAND POLICE DEPARTMENT
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL J. GUY and KELVIN D. MARTIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv05550
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Duncan v. Caldwell et al
as 2:2011cv02756
Plaintiff:
Johnny Duncan
Defendant:
James Caldwell, Tom Schedler, Julian Dufreche and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
