Cases 1 - 10 of 50
General MRO Aerospace, Inc. v. Moog Inc. et al
as 1:2026cv22857
Plaintiff:
General MRO Aerospace, Inc.
Defendant:
Moog Inc. and James Cody Ives
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
James Whitney v. Stacey Pectol, et al
as 25-2795
Plaintiff:
James E. Whitney, now known as James E. Wennerstein
Defendant:
Stacey Pectol, Criminal Justice Coordinator, Supreme Court of Arkansas, Karen R. Baker, Chief Justice, Arkansas Supreme Court, Courtney Hudson, Associate Justice, Arkansas Supreme Court and others
CODY et al v. PFIZER INC et al
as 3:2025cv00978
Plaintiff:
ROXANNE CODY and JAMES CODY
Defendant:
PFIZER INC, PHARMACIA & UPJOHN COMPANY LLC and PHARMACIA LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
McMahon v. Edwards et al
as 3:2023cv01013
Plaintiff:
James Cody McMahon
Defendant:
John Bel Edwards, Jeff Landry, Stacy Morrison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McMahon v. Campbell
as 3:2023cv00779
Petitioner:
James Cody McMahon
Defendant:
Warden Campbell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McMahon v. Louisiana et al
as 3:2023cv00504
Plaintiff:
James Cody McMahon
Defendant:
State of Louisiana, John Bel Edwards and Jeff Landry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hiers v. Berkeley County School District et al
as 2:2023cv00394
Plaintiff:
James Cody Hiers
Defendant:
South Carolina Department of Education, The and Berkeley County School District
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
James Campbell v. Rappahanock Regional Jail
as 23-6000
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES CODY CAMPBELL
Defendant / Appellee:
RAPPAHANOCK REGIONAL JAIL
Campbell v. Rappahanock Regional Jail
as 1:2022cv01376
Plaintiff:
James Cody Campbell
Defendant:
Rappahanock Regional Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Bivens Prisoner
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
