Cases 1 - 10 of 36
Montgomery v. Cotton
as 25-5090
Petitioner:
JAMES EDWARD MONTGOMERY
Respondent:
JAMES COTTON, Interim Warden
Cotton v. Martinez et al
as 4:2025cv04105
Plaintiff:
James Cotton
Defendant:
Brandon McCune, Roy Little, Jamar Range and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cotton v. 19065 Hammond Stolley, LLC
as 2:2025cv00455
Plaintiff:
James Cotton
Defendant:
19065 Hammond Stolley LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
James Cotton v. Latoya Hughes, et al
as 25-1073
Plaintiff:
JAMES COTTON
Defendant:
LATOYA HUGHES, FELICIA ADKINS, Warden, CHASE WIHELM and others
Cotton v. Hughes et al
as 2:2024cv02084
Plaintiff:
James Cotton
Defendant:
Latoya Hughes, Felicia Atkins, Chase Wilhelm and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martin v. Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2023cv00912
Plaintiff:
Anthony Lee Martin
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, Steven Harpe, Mark Knutson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cotton v. Cooper et al
as 5:2022ct03287
Plaintiff:
James Cotton
Defendant:
Roy Cooper, Eddie Buffaloe Jr., State of North Carolina and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James et al v. Cooper et al
as 5:2022ct03237
Plaintiff:
Harry Sharod James, Larry Robinson, Anthony Michael Finney and others
Defendant:
Roy Cooper, Eddie Buffaloe Jr., State of North Carolina and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COTTON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv36718
Plaintiff:
JAMES COTTON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
James Cotton v. Wade Stephens, Jr., et al
as 20-2670
Defendant / Appellee:
Ramon Estevez and Wade Stephens, Jr.
Plaintiff / Appellant:
James Cotton
Defendant:
Douglas County, Nebraska and Douglas County Correction Center
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
