Cases 1 - 10 of 32
Cotton v. Hughes et al
as 2:2024cv02084
Plaintiff:
James Cotton
Defendant:
Latoya Hughes, Felicia Atkins, Chase Wilhelm and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martin v. Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2023cv00912
Plaintiff:
Anthony Lee Martin
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, Steven Harpe, Mark Knutson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cotton v. Cooper et al
as 5:2022ct03287
Plaintiff:
James Cotton
Defendant:
Roy Cooper, Eddie Buffaloe Jr., State of North Carolina and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James et al v. Cooper et al
as 5:2022ct03237
Plaintiff:
Harry Sharod James, Larry Robinson, Anthony Michael Finney and others
Defendant:
Roy Cooper, Eddie Buffaloe Jr., State of North Carolina and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COTTON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv36718
Plaintiff:
JAMES COTTON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
James Cotton v. Wade Stephens, Jr., et al
as 20-2670
Defendant / Appellee:
Ramon Estevez and Wade Stephens, Jr.
Plaintiff / Appellant:
James Cotton
Defendant:
Douglas County, Nebraska and Douglas County Correction Center
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv06861
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Cotton v. Watson et al
as 3:2020cv03111
Defendant:
Passat Health Care Services, . Smith, John Trusewych and others
Plaintiff:
James Cotton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cotton v. Denton County TX
as 4:2018cv00842
Plaintiff:
Dr James Cotton
Defendant:
Denton County, Tx, Bailiff of 431st District, Bailiff of CCC7 Court and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cotton v. Denton County TX
as 4:2018cv00958
Plaintiff:
James Cotton
Defendant:
Denton County TX
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
