Cases 1 - 10 of 50
In re: Donald Davenport
as 19-2353
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner:
In re: DONALD JAMES DAVENPORT
DAVENPORT v. ASTRAZENECA LP et al
as 2:2019cv00658
Defendant:
MERCK & CO. INC. D/B/A MERCK, SHARP & DOHME CORPORATION, ASTRAZENECA LP and ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP
Plaintiff:
JAMES DAVENPORT
In Re:
PROTON-PUMP INHIBITOR PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION (No. II)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Davenport v. Pfizer, Inc. et al
as 3:2018cv03323
Plaintiff:
James Davenport
Defendant:
Pfizer, Inc. and Eli Lilly and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Willis v. Pickering et al
as 1:2018cv00093
Defendant:
Clara Beckett, Meghan Burse, County of Bastrop, Texas and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel James Willis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Davenport v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 8:2017cv01344
Plaintiff:
James Davenport
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Davenport v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2017cv00442
Plaintiff:
James Davenport
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Davenport v. Gomez et al.
as 2:2016cv01739
Plaintiff:
James Davenport
Defendant:
Gomez, E. Hernandez, M. Thompson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davenport v. Pfizer Inc.
as 3:2016cv01807
Plaintiff:
James Davenport
Defendant:
Pfizer Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
In re: Viagra (Sildenafil Citrate) Products Liability Litigation
as 3:2016md02691
Defendant:
Viagra (Sildenafil Citrate) Products Liability Litigation
Plaintiff:
Dennis Andrews, Amador Herrara, Lyle Toole and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Davenport v. Stellar Recovery, Inc.
as 3:2015cv01483
Plaintiff:
James Davenport
Defendant:
Stellar Recovery, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
