Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 38
Donahue et al v. 3M Company, f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Co. et al
as 2:2025cv11612
Plaintiff: Mark Donahue, Wendolyn Donald, James Donato and others
Defendant: 3M Company, f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Co., AGC Chemicals Americas Inc., Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 25-4544
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Harrell v. Orlando et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2025cv05926
Plaintiff: Eshawn Maurice Harrell
Defendant: Orlando, Markel, Stephen Manley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wade v. Kelly et al
as 3:2025mc80185
Plaintiff: E.K. Wade
Defendant: William H. Alsup, Hilda Solis, District Court Judge Jon S. Tigar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2025cv04487
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Sivak v. Donato
as 25-869
Plaintiff: LACEY SIVAK
Defendant: JAMES DONATO, DISTRICT JUDGE
Austin v. ABC Legal Services, LLC, et al.
as 25-734
Plaintiff: GEORGE JARVIS AUSTIN
Defendant: ABC LEGAL SERVICES, LLC, ALEX G. TSE, MAGISTRATE JUDGE, SUSAN ILLSTON, DISTRICT JUDGE and others
Austin v. Kia Corporation, et al.
as 25-26
Defendant: MAXINE M. CHESNEY, DISTRICT JUDGE, SUSAN ILLSTON, DISTRICT JUDGE, EPIQ GLOBAL and others
Plaintiff: GEORGE JARVIS AUSTIN
Austin v. ABC Legal Services, LLC, et al.
as 24-7383
Defendant: CHARLES R. BREYER, DISTRICT JUDGE, EDWARD M. CHEN, DISTRICT JUDGE, MAXINE M. CHESNEY, DISTRICT JUDGE and others
Plaintiff: GEORGE JARVIS AUSTIN
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv08258
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?