Cases 1 - 10 of 33
FRANKLIN v. TOWN OF NORWOOD et al
as 1:2024cv00005
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY SCOTT FRANKLIN
Defendant:
TOWN OF NORWOOD, TRENTEN JAMAR WEATHERS, JOHNATHAN LEE FURR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
PLATER v. USA
as 1:2023cv00575
Petitioner:
JAMES EDWARD PLATER, III
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
MITCHELL v. ROCKINGHAM COUNTY JAIL
as 1:2019cv00397
Plaintiff:
JAMES EDWARD MITCHELL
Defendant:
ROCKINGHAM COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MITCHELL v. ROCKINGHAM COUNTY JAIL
as 1:2019cv00304
Plaintiff:
JAMES EDWARD MITCHELL
Defendant:
ROCKINGHAM COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PRATT v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2019cv00054
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner:
JAMES EDWARD PRATT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
NORTH CAROLINA STATE CONFERENCE OF THE NAACP, et al v. THE NORTH CAROLINA STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS, et al
as 1:2016cv01274
Defendant:
THE NORTH CAROLINA STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS , A. GRANT WHITNEY, JR. , RHONDA K. AMOROSO and others
Plaintiff:
NORTH CAROLINA STATE CONFERENCE OF THE NAACP , MOORE COUNTY BRANCH OF THE NAACP , JAMES EDWARD ARTHUR, SR. and others
Interested_party:
UNITED STATES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1971
PRATT v. USA
as 1:2016cv00876
Petitioner:
JAMES EDWARD PRATT
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv01067
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested_party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
PRATT v. USA
as 1:2014cv00923
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
JAMES EDWARD PRATT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
MILES v. NADOLSKI
as 1:2014cv00674
Plaintiff:
JAMES EDWARD MILES
Defendant:
PATRICK NADOLSKI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
