Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Gamble et al v. Exactech, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00586
Plaintiff:
Marianne Gamble and James Gamble
Defendant:
Exactech, Inc. and Exactech, U.S., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
Christianson et al v. Cox Communications, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv01290
Plaintiff:
Donald Christianson, Isabel Prado, Neil Moura and others
Defendant:
Cox Communications, Inc., CoxCom, LLC and Cox Communications California, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 bc Diversity-Breach of Contract
Gamble v. United States of America
as 6:2021cv06273
Plaintiff:
Willie James Gamble
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GAMBLE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv85324
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN JAMES GAMBLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
James Harris, et al v. Muriel Bowser, et al
as 19-5246
Defendant / Appellee:
Douglas Scott Meyer, Art of Lounge, LLC, ABRA-06801, Muriel Bowser, in her official capacity as Mayor of the District of Columbia and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
James Harris and David Harris, III, Dr.
HARRIS et al v. BOWSER et al
as 1:2019cv00886
Defendant:
MURIEL ELIZABETH BOWSER, KFIR GAMLIEL, DOUGLAS SCOTT MEYER and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES HARRIS and DAVID HARRIS, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Gamble v. AT&T Mobility LLC
as 3:2012cv00712
Plaintiff:
James Gamble
Defendant:
AT&T Mobility LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gamble v. Griggs, et al
as 2:2011cv14987
Plaintiff:
James Gamble
Defendant:
Scott Griggs and Patrick Wehrman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
v. Gamble et al
as 2:2011cv14986
Defendant:
James Gamble, Scott Griggs and Patrick Wehrman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Larson v. Mahoney et al
as 6:2008cv00052
Plaintiff:
James L. Larson
Defendant:
Mike Mahoney, Jill Buck, Tony Barclay and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
