Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00799
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrim
HICKMAN v. 3M COMPANY
as 8:2023cv00019
Plaintiff:
JAMES HICKMAN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hickman v. LeBeouf Bros. Towing, L.L.C.
as 2:2022xc00048
Plaintiff:
Rocky James Hickman
Defendant:
LeBeouf Bros. Towing, L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000 Cause Code Unknown
In re: Walter Hickman
as 16-17414
Petitioner:
In re: WALTER JAMES HICKMAN
Successive Habeas Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Hickman v. Castillo et al
as 1:2015cv00296
Plaintiff:
James Hickman
Defendant:
Ramon Castillo, Aldon Helmert and Biloxi Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hickman v. Mobile Metro Jail et al
as 1:2012cv00608
Petitioner:
Johnny James Hickman
Respondent:
Mobile Metro Jail and Sam Cochran
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Soto v. Keenan, et al
as 6:2003cv06272
Plaintiff:
Efrain Soto
Defendant:
Shawn/Shaun Keenan , Daniel Labuzzetta , Kevin Burg and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HICKMAN et al v. A-BEST PRODUCTS COMPANY et al
as 2:2009cv91317
Plaintiff:
JAMES HICKMAN, JAMES HICKMAN, EVELYN HICKMAN and others
Defendant:
A-BEST PRODUCTS COMPANY, ACANDS, INC., ANCHOR PACKING COMPANY and others
ThirdParty Defendant:
MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPANSATION FUND
Cross Defendant:
A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY, OWENS-ILLINOIS, INC. and OGLEBAY NORTON CO.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Hickman v. United States of America
as 9:2008cv80235
Plaintiff:
Walter James Hickman
Defendant:
United States of America and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
