Cases 11 - 20 of 22
SHEPHERD v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv81818
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES SHEPHERD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SHEPHERD v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv71722
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC and others
Plaintiff:
NICKOLAS JAMES SHEPHERD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SILVA et al v 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2019cv03329
Plaintiff:
ROGER RATHBUN, WAYNE ROSEBROCK, MATTHEW PUCCINI and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY and AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Silva et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2019cv02263
Plaintiff:
Roger Rathbun, Wayne Rosebrock, Matthew Puccini and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies, LLC
SHEPHERD v. ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP et al
as 2:2019cv11392
Defendant:
MERCK & CO. INC. D/B/A MERCK, SHARP & DOHME CORPORATION, NOVARTIS PHARMACEUTICAL CORPORATION, TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES SHEPHERD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Shepherd v. Metz et al
as 2:2017cv11063
Plaintiff:
James Shepherd
Defendant:
Jeffrey Metz and Flat Rock, City of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv00705
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Shepherd v. Pro Fit Iron Gym et al
as 1:2012cv04788
Defendant:
Ontel Products Corporation, and Pro Fit Iron Gym
Plaintiff:
James Shepherd
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Janene Shepherd, et al v. USA
as 10-5662
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JANENE L. SHEPHERD, JAMES SHEPHERD and ARICA J. SHEPHERD
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Wells-Thompson et al v Forest River, Inc. et al
as 2:2009cv06505
Plaintiff:
Najee Wells-Thompson, Elizabeth White, Sherry Yarborough and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
