Cases 1 - 10 of 36
TYSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv34748
Plaintiff:
JAMES TYSON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
ABREGO et al v 3M COMPANY
as 9:2023cv08190
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH ABREGO, ANTONIO AGUILAR, JOSE R AGUILERA and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
TYSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv03744
Plaintiff:
JAMES TYSON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Abrego et al v. 3M Company
as MN/0:23-CV-02818
Plaintiff:
Joseph Abrego, Antonio Aguilar, Jose R Aguilera and others
Defendant:
3M Company
Abrego et al v. 3M Company
as 0:2023cv02818
Plaintiff:
Joseph Abrego, Antonio Aguilar, Jose R Aguilera and others
Defendant:
3M Company
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv01539
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00437
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
TYSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv01412
Plaintiff:
JAMES TYSON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
ALMQUIST v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv00776
Plaintiff:
NATHAN ALMQUIST, PHILLIP ANDERSON, CHARLES ANTHONY and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Nathan Almquist, et al v. 3M Company, et al
as 21-3246
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Nathan Almquist, Phillip Anderson, Charles Anthony and others
Defendant / Appellant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies LLC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
