Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Watson v. Waterford Point, LLC
as 1:2026cv26359
Plaintiff:
James Watson
Defendant:
Waterford Point, LLC doing business as d/b/a Waterford Point Apartments
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601 Fair Housing Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv26350
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601 Fair Housing Act
Watson v. RATFI, LLC,
as 1:2026cv26140
Plaintiff:
James Watson
Defendant:
RATFI, LLC, doing business as d/b/a Residences at The Falls
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601 Fair Housing Act
Watson v. GS Brickell Project Owner, LLC,
as 1:2026cv26136
Plaintiff:
James Watson
Defendant:
GS Brickell Project Owner, LLC, doing business as d/b/a SOMA at Brickell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601 Fair Housing Act
Watson v. Real Lurra US III Inc.
as 1:2026cv26070
Plaintiff:
James Watson
Defendant:
Real Lurra US III Inc. doing business as d/b/a Blume Coral Gables
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601 Fair Housing Act
Watson v. Westdale Blue Lagoon, LLC,
as 1:2026cv25950
Plaintiff:
James Watson
Defendant:
Westdale Blue Lagoon, LLC, doing business as d/b/a Blue Lagoon 7
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601 Fair Housing Act
In re: James Watson
as 26-2189
Petitioner:
In re: JAMES WATSON
Respondent:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY BRADFORD COUNTY
Jordan v. Department of Corrections
as 26-1365
Plaintiff:
VICTOR L. JORDAN, SR.
Defendant:
DAVE, R.N., CONNECTICUT DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, COLLEEN GALLAGHER and others
Campbell v. Davis et al (INMATE 1)
as 1:2026cv00204
Plaintiff:
James Watson Campbell
Defendant:
Gwendolyn Davis and Reosha Butler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2026cv60294
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
