Cases 1 - 10 of 118
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 14-2203
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Robinson Martinez v. USA, et al
as 14-20642
Petitioner - Appellant:
ROBINSON MARTINEZ
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL, JANET NAPOLITANO, SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 14-41029
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 14-1947
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 14-60312
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-51203
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Carlos Torvisco v. MO Field Officer Director, et al
as 13-3377
Petitioner - Appellant:
Carlos Humberto Torvisco
Respondent - Appellee:
Janet Napolitano, Secretary, Department of Homeland Security, Eric H. Holder, Jr., Attorney General of the United States and Missouri Field Office Director, Immigration and Customs Enforcement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-31027
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-30937
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Nabil Aissi v. Jeffrey Crawford
as 13-7426
Petitioner - Appellant:
NABIL AHMED AISSI
Respondent - Appellee:
JEFFREY CRAWFORD, Warden, Farmville Immigration Detention Center, JOHN MORTON, Director, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, THOMAS HOMAN, Executive Associate Director, Enforcement and Removal Operations, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.