Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Burgess et al v. Forest River, Inc.
as 3:2023cv00781
Plaintiff:
Cheree Burgess and Jason Burgess
Defendant:
Forest River, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
BURGESS v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv13603
Plaintiff:
JASON BURGESS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Perez Mendez v. Continental Expedited Services Inc. et al
as 7:2022cv00011
Plaintiff:
Ana Gabriela Perez Mendez
Defendant:
Continental Expedited Services Inc. and Jason Burgess
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
BURGESS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv51187
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JASON BURGESS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BURGESS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv10957
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
BRAD JASON BURGESS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Khan et al v. Hemosphere Inc., et al
as 1:2018cv05368
Plaintiff:
Iftikhar Khan and Nazir Khan
Defendant:
Hemosphere Inc., James D. Lawson, F. Noel Parent and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145
Melton v Cherokee County Sheriff's Office et al
as 7:2017cv03362
Plaintiff:
Timothy Melton
Defendant:
Cherokee County Sheriff's Office and Jason Burgess
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burgess v. Cooper
as 1:2013cv00026
Petitioner:
Robert Jason Burgess
Respondent:
Robert C. Cooper, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2010cv00028
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1701
Case Opened in Error
as 7:2010cv00025
Plaintiff:
2433 South Boulevard, LLC, LORRAINE ANGEL, Michael Austin and others
Receiver:
William K. Angel
Petitioner:
Julie Hunter
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1701
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
