Cases 11 - 20 of 128
Jamal Sharifpour v. Liberty Healthcare Corporation, et al
as 22-2593
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMAL SHARIFPOUR
Defendant / Appellee:
LIBERTY HEALTHCARE CORPORATION, SHAN JUMPER, GREGG SCOTT and others
PEREZ v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv14912
Plaintiff:
DOMINIC JAVIER PEREZ
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00786
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
USA v. Javier Perez
as 22-2135
Plaintiff / Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellee:
JAVIER PEREZ
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-11580
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Classified By Court:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Mauricio Usme, et al v. CMI Leisure Management, Inc., et al
as 22-11324
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MAURICIO USME, LUKASZ ZUTEREK, CAROLINA VASQUEZ and others
Defendant / Appellee:
CMI LEISURE MANAGEMENT, INC., CRUISE MANAGEMENT INTERNATIONAL, INC. and VIKAND MEDICAL SOLUTIONS, LLC
PEREZ-CRESPO v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv02980
Plaintiff:
JAVIER PEREZ-CRESPO
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Jose Javier Perez v. Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv00780
Plaintiff:
Jose Javier Perez
Defendant:
Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc., Toyota Motor Corporation and Southeast Toyota Distributors, LLC
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv20032
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Perez v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2021cv03536
Defendant:
3M Company, The, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Dominic Javier Perez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
