Cases 1 - 10 of 87
ANDREWS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2023cv00353
Plaintiff:
ALBERT ANDREWS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE ATTORNEY GENERAL JEFF SESSIONS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE ATTORNEY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Prisoner Bivens Action
ANDREWS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2023cv00250
Plaintiff:
ALBERT LEE ANDREWS, III
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JEFF SESSIONS, RIPLEY RAND and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Michael Harriot v. DOJ
as 19-7344
Defendant / Appellee:
ROBERT WAIZENHOFFER, FBI Special Agent, SCARLETT A. WILSON, Former AUSA, STACEY DENISE HAYNES, AUSA and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL OWEN HARRIOT
Williams v. Colvin et al
as 7:2019cv00292
Plaintiff:
Craig Alan Williams
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin, Thomas T Cullen and Jeff Session
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Webb v. United States of America (INMATE 3)
as 1:2018cv01456
Defendant:
Walter Woods, Donald Trump, of America United States and others
Plaintiff:
David Webb
Interested Party:
Staff Attorneys
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2018cv03458
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2018cv02918
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv03290
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv01290
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Perkins v. Sessions et al
as 8:2018cv02905
Defendant:
US Attorney General Jeff Sessions and Ryan Zinke
Plaintiff:
Christopher Perkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
